Should we link a Job's Plan with Taxing Millionaires?
What's wrong with a quid pro quo when it comes to a Millionaires Tax to pay for a Job's Plan? I'll tell you what's wrong with it. And I do support a Job's Plan and I support a tax on Millionaires. What I don't support is a link of a tax increase specifically implied to pay for it, rather than paying for the general expenses of the government. You see it sets a precedent. We know our taxes go to pay a piece of every government program and expense. But if we start down this path think about how many will say they don't want to pay the part of their taxes that pays for our Military or they don't want to pay for their part of the IRS or the Energy Dept., or the EPA.
I think we should get more taxes to help offset the expenses and debts we have incurred at this time in our economy. And I think those increased taxes would be best obtained from those who have had the most tax breaks and can best afford it. That means taxing the Millionaires and Billionaires a little more. And we should couch those increases as needed to help us fund the government, not just a Job's program. Fairness in taxation is a must.
What do you think? Leave a comment.
I think we should get more taxes to help offset the expenses and debts we have incurred at this time in our economy. And I think those increased taxes would be best obtained from those who have had the most tax breaks and can best afford it. That means taxing the Millionaires and Billionaires a little more. And we should couch those increases as needed to help us fund the government, not just a Job's program. Fairness in taxation is a must.
What do you think? Leave a comment.
Labels: government, Job's plan, linking, Millionaires tax, tax breaks, tax increases, taxation
